The “lucky country” is an attractive destination for international businesses seeking to expand their footprint. However, offshore entities targeting Australia should be aware of the regulatory and financial consequences of entering the market, and the possible ways to set up shop. This article looks at when a foreign entity is deemed to ‘carry on business’ in Australia, the primary consequences of doing so, and key considerations in effectively structuring operations down under.
Australia is the 12th largest economy in the world,[1] and is consistently ranked as a top 20 country for international trade and investment.[2] Despite a population of less than 27 million people, the average net worth of each individual ranks 5th globally and 2nd in the Asia Pacific region,[3] making it attractive for foreign entry by overseas players.
Historically, the island state has close cultural ties with the UK and Europe, and modern Australia is increasingly linked with the United States. However it is far from homogenous, being one of the most ethnically diverse nations in the world, with a history of immigration that has shaped its demographics, culture, and economy. Further, despite its overwhelmingly larger domestic market, China has long set its sights on Australian consumers, with its competitive advantage in cost-effectively producing a wide array of appealing products for Australian consumers.
Examples abound of market entry by foreigners.
However, Australia has numerous regulations on business activities by foreign entities to ensure that its regulatory landscape, consumers and taxation revenues are protected. Foreign entrants with their eyes on the world’s 5th richest consumers need to be aware of Australian laws to avoid being unwittingly exposed to compliance obligations, regulatory enforcement and financial costs.
Whether an entity is deemed to carry on business in Australia (in this article, COBIA) is determined primarily by a mix of Statutes, read together with common law judgments, regulatory instruments, and government rulings.
Without being exhaustive, the primary laws of relevance in connection with COBIA are:
Each have differing tests of COBIA. However, where the test is triggered, obligations under that legislation will be enlivened. This can be administratively burdensome and costly, and potentially imperil the success of business plans.
However, as we discuss later, scope exists to potentially tailor a legal business model that optimises the position of the foreign business under Australian law, and facilitate a successful endeavour down under.
Below, we outline the key COBIA laws and obligations.
In addition to the above, if a foreign entity:
When considering targeting Australian consumers, a complex array of business models are available, in different shapes and sizes. However the incorporation of a local subsidiary will lead to less shades of grey with respect to COBIA tests.
Incorporating a Local Subsidiary
If the foreign entity chooses to incorporate a local subsidiary in Australia, this is likely to quickly meet most relevant COIBA tests. In particular, this would mean that:
Not Incorporating Local Subsidiary
Alternatively, a foreign entity may operate through their foreign entity. This might involve employees flying in and out to do business and contracts being signed offshore by the foreign entity.
In such cases, whether the entity is COBIA will typically be less clear-cut.
Use of a Local Agent
Similar to the above, the foreign entity may engage an independent contractor to act as an agent for the entity in Australia. In this example, the foreign company may not be COBIA, provided that the agent:
However in practice this may be difficult. Risks of COBIA arise where:
Foreign businesses seeking to enter the Australian market need to be aware of the factors, buried under a patchwork quilt of laws and regulations, that may trigger the COBIA tests. If deemed to be COBIA, depending on its exact activities, the foreign business will be exposed to local statutory and regulatory compliance requirements, taxes and potential penalties.
If the foreign entity chooses to incorporate a local subsidiary, this is likely to quickly meet most relevant COBIA tests. Using a local subsidiary is a common approach, and it may best suit the foreign entity’s business purposes and goals down under. However there are alternative tailored structures that could better fit what the entity and its stakeholders seek to achieve.
When considering a move into the Australian market, timely and expert guidance is highly advisable.
Are you interested in expanding your foreign operations to Australia? To avoid being caught in contravention of the array of Australian legal frameworks, please contact us below. Edwards + Co has a wealth of experience advising companies on corporate and commercial matters under Australian law.
[1] According to the International Monetary Fund – World Economic Outlook Update, April 2022.
[2] https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/australia-is-a-top-20-country-all-topics.pdf.
[3] UBS Global Wealth Report 2024.
[4] Section 21 Corps Act.
[5] Section 21(3) Corps Act.
[6] Australia has a corporate tax rate of 25 – 30% depending on the size of the business, and foreign entities carrying on business will also be taxed at this rate for its Australian sourced income.
[7] TR 2019/1.
[8] Defined in most of Australia’s tax treaties and subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936, and also applies for the purposes of both the of ITAA 1997 and Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953: TR 2002/5.
[9] S. 5B, Privacy Act.
[10] Facebook Inc v. Australian Information Commissioner [2022] FCAFC 9.
[11] Accordingly, the Commissioner to pursue Facebook for a breach of the Privacy Act for a maximum a civil penalty of $2.22 million for serious and/or repeated interference with the privacy of an individual.
[12] Valve Corporation v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2017] FCAFC 224.